Connect
To Top

Alessandra Ambrosio by Matthias Vriens-McGrath for Numéro Tokyo January/February 2011

In front of Matthias Vriens-McGrath’s lens, Alessandra Ambrosio unleashes her inner vixen for the January issue of Numéro Tokyo. Starring alongside to studly males, Alessandra takes on strong and sexy looks from the likes of Dior, Chanel and Michael Kors styled by Masha Orlov. / Casting & Production by Andrey T. for MVM Studio






Shop New Styles

25 Comments

  1. Anonymous

    December 3, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    She is sooooooooo scary looking. One of those faces that cannot carry all that make up, otherwise, “hello hot tranny mess”!!

    That first photo, it looks like she has NO arms, only numbs. Its so freaky. What a bad bad bad editorial.

  2. Anonymous

    December 3, 2010 at 6:03 pm

    Love Alessandra, great beauty, but this doesn’t work for me for some reason.

  3. Karen

    December 3, 2010 at 6:09 pm

    i dislike alessandra in editorials

  4. Anita Siraki

    December 3, 2010 at 6:43 pm

    i totally thought she hand no arms in the first photo! and i want the no eyebrows look to STOP!!!! it doesn’t look good! especially with someone like alessandra and her strong features!…the man candy is nice though :)

    http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/

    • Aggie

      December 4, 2010 at 7:08 pm

      Me too! I was wondering where her ams disappeared to.

  5. lizzie

    December 3, 2010 at 7:05 pm

    i was totally confused by the first photo too. she needs her eyebrows back. there’s just no getting around it

  6. Dave

    December 3, 2010 at 8:41 pm

    i don’t like the makeup work, especially around the cheeks and mouth. it almost makes her look like a completely different person.

  7. anonymous

    December 3, 2010 at 8:59 pm

    Terrifying. She looks really rough.

  8. Anonymous

    December 3, 2010 at 9:01 pm

    This absolutely horrifying. Her harsh features cannot carry that much makeup. Makes her look like a tranny.

  9. Love, Lace, Luxe

    December 3, 2010 at 9:29 pm

    I hate the makeup in this! Her face looks way to thin too…

    http://www.lovelaceluxe.com

  10. Liz

    December 3, 2010 at 9:39 pm

    Her features are too masculine to carry that much harsh make-up; it only emphasizes it in the most awful way imaginable.

  11. guest

    December 3, 2010 at 9:59 pm

    cant’t watch this ..A go away!!!

  12. Mel Couteau

    December 4, 2010 at 2:01 am

    Two faces: sexy mouth open and sexy mouth closed.

  13. Karolina

    December 4, 2010 at 2:40 am

    I like her face less and less….

  14. Anon

    December 4, 2010 at 5:41 am

    o ho ho! This arrogant ‘model’ is annoying. Keep your slut drawl on the VS runway where it belongs!
    *loving* the male models though. Yum.

  15. Megan V

    December 4, 2010 at 6:16 am

    It seems like she is “over modeling” in all of these photos. Right?? And where did her eyebrows go? Creepy!

  16. ELOUISE

    December 4, 2010 at 11:57 am

    ahha Im sure this will be on the list ´’ugliest editorial this month’

  17. Honeypot119

    December 4, 2010 at 7:22 pm

    I mean this editorial is really offensive not only because the model is cheap as chips, but in the 5th pic, we don’t need a white woman holding a necklace around a black model’s neck like an animal. When is the fashion world going to wake up to this racist imagery!

    • New Decent

      December 7, 2010 at 6:39 pm

      It’s interesting how nobody else bothered to point that out. As for your question about the future I think it’s rational to expect that fashion will as always follow, not lead, changes in real (economic, military, territorial, etc) power. Obama’s pretentious post-racial hype does not qualify.

  18. Mrtrillianpink

    December 4, 2010 at 8:43 pm

    This is startlingly racist. How is this allowed in an reputable publication?

  19. Spotmag

    December 4, 2010 at 9:03 pm

    come on… is good to see that she can do a different sexy. she is not pretty in this work and is all I love about it…
    http://www.spotmag.blogspot.com

  20. Carol

    December 5, 2010 at 7:01 am

    I agree spotmag! and also, poeple from the fashion industrie love her more and more!!! I love to see her in this high fahshion editorials, not just the comercial stuff, once we already know that she is gourgeous ans super sexy!!

  21. Anonymous

    December 6, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    her sharp features CANNOT carry that much makeup. Its just not an option for her.

  22. Hnghfvv

    December 8, 2010 at 8:58 pm

    I’ll take a sex bomb model like her anyday over some bloated egg head chipmunk looking model. they need to go away ASAP.

  23. kkyle

    January 25, 2011 at 10:42 pm

    i agree, it doesn’t work for me either, i don’t think the makeup artist made best work of her features… she is gorgeous, but her face isn’t working for me here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in 2010

Fashion Gone Rogue is a website that showcases the the latest in fashion and culture for women. For any questions and contact information, please consult our FAQ.

Facebook

Sign Up to Receive Our Daily Updates by Email


© 2015 Fashion Gone Rogue