i love it
but it’s such a ‘done before’ ed’ idea.
the pictures look like bad quality somehow
Today’s modern digital photography has a sleek, clean look that only came about when digital cameras came about. Film will never have that tack sharp, sheeny finish that digital does, and film lovers prefer it that way. Grainy doesn’t mean “bad quality,” it means either film or manipulated digital. Either way, the look is purposeful, and in no way denotes poor quality photography. This shoot is gorgeous. Well composed, well colored, and well manipulated for a vintage feel appropriate for the narrative. I’m guessing it’s digital because it’s new and I don’t know the photographer’s other work, but it could be either.
I’ve seen comments about “bad quality” on Fashion Gone Rogue lately, and I want to clear up the misconception. Not everything has to be shiny!!
I love, LOVE this. It’s so different from what I’ve seen lately. I think that the quality of the pictures is like that, because they looks like something Frida might have painted.
Well, isn’t this gorgeous?
I always really like the eds in Marie Claire Italia (this one included), much better than the US version.
what on earth is going on with the monkey/watermelon pattern?
guess it’s a freda reference I don’t get!
Wow. I love the vivid colors coupled with the vintage photography. Stunning!
wow! love it!
she is stunning!!!!
I really, really love it. Love the imagery, love the girl. I did think it could have been edited down, felt like it should have left me wanting more, not feeling too full.
i think the photography and art direction in this are absolutely amazing.
She’s very stunning. These photos are cool.
Just like that Emily Senko is one of the prettiest faces in fashion today.
Wow I think that this is absolutely stunning… Beautiful model, beautiful hair, beautiful makeup, great settings and photographer. I just love it all :)