Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published May 8, 2011

/

Updated September 3, 2019

Cotton Candy Girls – Photographer Lara Jade takes to the open fields and blue skies for the latest issue of Material Girl. Working with stylist Lauren Armes, Jade captures Gigi and Irena in airy ethereal looks with pink bobs courtesy of hair stylist Damian Monzillo. / Makeup by Damian Monzillo, Retouching by Lara Jade







Recent Updates

Jennie Maison Kitsune Featured

Jennie is Pretty in Pastels for Maison Kitsuné Ad

Spring 2024 welcomes Jennie of Blackpink as the new face of Maison Kitsuné's Baby Fox collection. In a laid-back ad ...
Neiman Marcus Spring 2024 Featured

Neiman Marcus Spring 2024 Campaign: Championing Elegance

Neiman Marcus embraces the dynamism of sports and luxury fashion in its "Quest for the Best" spring 2024 campaign, captured ...
Swarovski Spring 2024 Featured

Irina Shayk, Karlie Kloss Bring Mermaidcore to Swarovski Ad

Swarovski takes a deep dive into the mythical with its spring-summer 2024 campaign, channeling the allure of Venus and embracing ...
Oliver Peoples Khaite Spring 2024 Featured

Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024: Crafting Chic Eyewear

The Oliver Peoples x KHAITE Spring 2024 collection promises an eyewear feast for the fashion-forward. Exemplifying an industrial chic aesthetic, ...
Nina Cosmic Featured

Nina T Gets Interstellar for Numéro Switzerland

In "Cosmic Being," photographed by Ana Abril, a futuristic fashion editorial takes place in Numéro Switzerland's premiere issue. Model Nina ...
Zara Jeans Spring Featured

Zara Jeans Spring 2024: Exploring Casual Styles

The season of renewal brings with it Zara's spring 2024 jeans collection, offering a refreshing take on denim that pays ...

56 thoughts on “Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl”

  1. ohmygod…i looove the pastel colors!!!

    but the photography technique is very usual

    devi-kusumawardani.blogspot.com

    Reply
  2. totally in love with the colors/ styling and photography!

    btw do drop by my site as i have EXTENDED THE BRASHY x MONSTRE XI GIVEAWAY by a week. No harm trying your luck for a cool tshirt (:

    x leonie

    Reply
  3. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    Reply
    • The person above you isn’t “hating,” they gave their opinion in a very polite and intelligent way. If they don’t like the photography, then they don’t like it, everyone feels differently about things as subjective as this editorial.

      Reply
      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

        Reply
      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

        Reply
      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

        Reply
  4. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    Reply
  5. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    Reply
  6. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    Reply
  7. It means well…but there is no attention to detail…like the fact that it is a brown, dry, dirty looking setting, and the girls look cold, and those kind of cheap plastic wigs only look good when they have been trimmed..half-assed Tim Walker….not good

    Reply
  8. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

    Reply
  9. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

    Reply
  10. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

    Reply
  11. It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

    Reply
  12. It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

    Reply
  13.      Well-known luxury brands (Louis Vuitton). Louis Vuitton was founded in 1854?authentic louis vuitton, now part of French post-production high luxury goods group Moet Hennessy LouisVuitton?louis vuitton black. Founder of the first post of Louis Vuitton LV jewelry industry for the elite aristocracy?louis vuitton outlet?when pack when traveling. He witnessed the invention of the steam train?louis vuitton wallet, also witnessed the development of steamshipcheap miu miu?transportation?cheap fendi, but also deeply appreciate the dome was closed stacked luggage difficulties?louis vuitton sofia coppola.  

    Reply

Leave a Reply to january Cancel reply