Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published May 8, 2011

/

Updated September 3, 2019

Cotton Candy Girls – Photographer Lara Jade takes to the open fields and blue skies for the latest issue of Material Girl. Working with stylist Lauren Armes, Jade captures Gigi and Irena in airy ethereal looks with pink bobs courtesy of hair stylist Damian Monzillo. / Makeup by Damian Monzillo, Retouching by Lara Jade







Recent Updates

Zara Jeans Spring Featured

Zara Jeans Spring 2024: Exploring Casual Styles

The season of renewal brings with it Zara's spring 2024 jeans collection, offering a refreshing take on denim that pays ...
Makeup Looks Featured

Makeup Looks to Inspire: 15 Stunning Ideas for 2024

Makeup looks offer a canvas for self-expression, blending everything from the subtle allure of neutral tones to the vibrant impact ...
Penelope Cruz Chanel Iconic Handbag Featured

Penélope Cruz & Brad Pitt Are Iconic in Chanel Handbag Ad

Chanel's 2024 campaign for its Iconic Handbag enlists the magnetic allure of Penélope Cruz alongside Brad Pitt, offering a theme ...
Cara Delevingne Stella McCartney Feature

Cara Delevingne is Eco-Chic in Stella McCartney’s Summer Ad

In a striking gesture of environmental advocacy, Stella McCartney has enlisted supermodel and actress Cara Delevingne for her summer 2024 ...
Tom Ford Summer 2024 Featured

Tom Ford Summer 2024 Campaign: A Season of Luxe

Tom Ford has officially launched its summer 2024 collection with a compelling campaign that channels luxury and sensuality. With creative ...
Black Hair Types Featured

Black Hair Types: Unraveling the Beauty of Coils & Curls

Understanding the diversity of Black hair types is fundamental for those seeking to nurture and style their hair effectively. Whether ...

56 thoughts on “Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl”

  1. ohmygod…i looove the pastel colors!!!

    but the photography technique is very usual

    devi-kusumawardani.blogspot.com

    Reply
  2. totally in love with the colors/ styling and photography!

    btw do drop by my site as i have EXTENDED THE BRASHY x MONSTRE XI GIVEAWAY by a week. No harm trying your luck for a cool tshirt (:

    x leonie

    Reply
  3. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    Reply
    • The person above you isn’t “hating,” they gave their opinion in a very polite and intelligent way. If they don’t like the photography, then they don’t like it, everyone feels differently about things as subjective as this editorial.

      Reply
      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

        Reply
      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

        Reply
      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

        Reply
  4. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    Reply
  5. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    Reply
  6. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    Reply
  7. It means well…but there is no attention to detail…like the fact that it is a brown, dry, dirty looking setting, and the girls look cold, and those kind of cheap plastic wigs only look good when they have been trimmed..half-assed Tim Walker….not good

    Reply
  8. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

    Reply
  9. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

    Reply
  10. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

    Reply
  11. It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

    Reply
  12. It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

    Reply
  13.      Well-known luxury brands (Louis Vuitton). Louis Vuitton was founded in 1854?authentic louis vuitton, now part of French post-production high luxury goods group Moet Hennessy LouisVuitton?louis vuitton black. Founder of the first post of Louis Vuitton LV jewelry industry for the elite aristocracy?louis vuitton outlet?when pack when traveling. He witnessed the invention of the steam train?louis vuitton wallet, also witnessed the development of steamshipcheap miu miu?transportation?cheap fendi, but also deeply appreciate the dome was closed stacked luggage difficulties?louis vuitton sofia coppola.  

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Jayde Cancel reply