This would be shot before Vogue Australia came out. It’s probably pure coincidence.
banana
I would hardly call that a copy, similar but not alarmingly so. Still, whatever way you cut it, it’s a terrible cover!
Anonymous
I wasnt trying to imply it was copied, LIKE it was copied since its so similar. Both covers are average best. Im not sure why Nicole is covering a magazine period. Her eyes look dead.
flo
she looks absolutely dreadful. The make up, her eye color with that stupid cheap eyeliner, she looks sick. Those flowers give me a headache, maybe that is what happened to her too?
Ferdinand
Dear Harper’s and Vogue, please, please go back to putting models on your covers. Celebrities are neither alluring nor glamorous, and we see enough of them everywhere.
Anonymous
For some reason, these fashion editors think that celebrities are stylish. I cant recall ONE celebrity that has an actual style. Most of them are boring, tacky, over-the-top. Fascination of them is beyond me. US Vogue particulary is obsessed with celebrities on cover. It doesnt say much about the audience now, doesnt it?
marie
Wow. She looks absolutely terribly. I second Ferdinand’s comment.
permpfffff
Is this for fucking real? Or some kind of sick joke?
I’ve coughed up better looking things than this!
http://stylometre.blogspot.com Vikki
Definitely not a flattering shoot of Nicole.
Plus, she seems to be everywhere these days!