Kate Moss strips down for the latest campaign from Brazilian lingerie label, Valisere. Photographed by Gui Paganini and with retouching by Alex Wink of Studio AW, the British supermodel wears sexy lace garments paired with simple tees and elegant jackets. It makes us wish it were spring already!
i’ve never seen Kate Moss more photoshopped in my life!
agree, worst kate moss story ever
it looks like she’s got new lips&an eye lift…
it looks like she’s got new lips&an eye lift…
I’m pretty sure Brigitte Bardot’s lips from old 60’s photos where superimposed on this mess…I mean…
so shopped 😉 I know it’s supposed to look sexy, but it just seems like she’s half-asleep in most of those ;P
so shopped 😉 I know it’s supposed to look sexy, but it just seems like she’s half-asleep in most of those ;P
her eyes look so empty, way too much photoshop!
Kate moss is extremly gorgeous but these pictures are really way to much photoshopped..
I mean they are beautiful but really shopped!
Stay happy & Live.Laugh.Love.
http://www.style1509.blogspot.com
Kate moss is extremly gorgeous but these pictures are really way to much photoshopped..
I mean they are beautiful but really shopped!
Stay happy & Live.Laugh.Love.
http://www.style1509.blogspot.com
OMG SO much retouching! She almost looks like a blow-up doll!
She can still work it so they have no problem hiring a great retoucher. Nothing wrong with that.
Although I’m not exactly sure how I feel about her shooting for a lingerie campaign… lol.
She can still work it so they have no problem hiring a great retoucher. Nothing wrong with that.
Although I’m not exactly sure how I feel about her shooting for a lingerie campaign… lol.
UAAAAAAAU! AHAZA GUI E FLAVIA! LINDO!!!
If her name weren’t in the title, I would never guess this was Kate. It doesn’t look at all like her; this could be any random, photo-chopped throw-away model.
She’s hardly recognizable. Might as well have used a plastic mannequin.
She’s hardly recognizable. Might as well have used a plastic mannequin.
She’s hardly recognizable. Might as well have used a plastic mannequin.
give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.
give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.
give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.
give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.
give a new girl a go with pretty uninteresting undergarments. go home kate! be selective.
What happened to her face?:S
Photoshop happened.
Photoshop happened.
MONEY MONEY MONEY FOR HER!!
i barely recognized her … or do now 🙁 sometimes i hate photoshop
ewwwww so gross. she looks like she has googley eyes. what were they thinking.
I have seen much crap in my days, but this could really be the worst editorial. Ever.
Uncrecognizable. Holy mother of BAD photoshop. This is just AWFUL. I agree with comment above, one of the worst editorials I’ve ever seen.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
Nobody is questioning the line between fantasy and reality in fashion. At one point, when you exhaust any emotion or humanity out of an editorial, you get this. This isnt fantasy, but this isnt reality, this is JUST PLAIN BAD. Most of the comments are negative on here for a reason, so dont pretend to be a know-it-all and simply express an opinion. Thats all.
Nobody is questioning the line between fantasy and reality in fashion. At one point, when you exhaust any emotion or humanity out of an editorial, you get this. This isnt fantasy, but this isnt reality, this is JUST PLAIN BAD. Most of the comments are negative on here for a reason, so dont pretend to be a know-it-all and simply express an opinion. Thats all.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
All you haters don’t know how much Photoshopping went on post production. There’s also the lighting and make-up during the actual shoot and the time exposure/aperture the photographer set on his camera. Oh and it’s a lingerie shoot so sexy hair and half closed eyes are to be expected. Bottom line, I’ve said this before, you want reality don’t look at fashion magazines.
she looks flat in these shoots…can’t believe it…
seriously! ir you’re going to hire Kate Moss and photo shop her….. you could hire any other model and pay much less!! ’cause for paying kate moss and doing this to her is like A TOTAL WASTE! I don’t get it at all……….. and if you ‘re not talking money, then this is an awfull editorial any ways! it is jst nonsense!! I agree with almost everyone above
what a waste of time, no creativity or edge to this shoot whatsoever. Compare this ru~’#sh to the La Perla S/S 2010 campaign with Guinevere VAN SEENUS and then you know what has gone wrong. Guinevere rocks lingerie, Kate sadly lost it a long time ago, let’s say circa CK/Marky Mark days!
what a waste of time, no creativity or edge to this shoot whatsoever. Compare this ru~’#sh to the La Perla S/S 2010 campaign with Guinevere VAN SEENUS and then you know what has gone wrong. Guinevere rocks lingerie, Kate sadly lost it a long time ago, let’s say circa CK/Marky Mark days!