Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published April 26, 2010

The Block shows us Marilyn Agency‘s most promising fresh faces with a dark and macabre spread published in their spring issue. Photographed by Louis Christopher, Kristina Krivomazova, Hannah Johnson, Josefin Hedstrom, Tetyana McInychuk, Yulia Leontieva, Melodie Dagault, Rel Dade, Chantal Stafford Abbott and Thana Kuhnen wear a mix of vintage garments and powerful accessories from the likes of Givenchy, Park Choon Moo and Longchamp styled by James Worthington DeMolet.











Recent Updates

Sabrina Carpenter SKIMS Featured

Sabrina Carpenter Channels Retro Style in SKIMS Ad

Sabrina Carpenter steps into the limelight as the new face of SKIMS, highlighting the Stretch Lace and Fits Everybody collections ...
Courreges Spring 2024

Courrèges Spring 2024 Campaign: Floating into the Season

Courrèges introduces its spring-summer 2024 campaign with an ethereal blend of motion and stillness. Photographer David Sims captures the essence ...
Anisa Dagher Bazaar Feature

Anisa Dagher Wears Bold Designs in Harper’s Bazaar Thailand

The March 2024 edition of Harper's Bazaar Thailand becomes a canvas for Anisa Dagher's striking presence, captured by photographer Andrew ...
Strawberry Blonde Hair Color Featured

Strawberry Blonde Hair Color: From Classic to Modern Shades

Strawberry blonde hair color is a beautiful blend of light red and golden blonde tones that exude warmth. This timeless ...
Kaia Gerber DKNY Heart of NY

Kaia Gerber Exudes Cool in DKNY’s Heart of NY Capsule

DKNY's Heart of NY capsule collection celebrates the vibrant spirit that pulsates through the streets of New York City with ...
Ralph Lauren Romance Eau de Parfum

Ralph Lauren Romance Intense Ad: Love & the Outdoors

Ralph Lauren's latest fragrance advertisement for Romance Eau de Parfum Intense welcomes the essence of spirited freedom, capturing the scenic ...

17 thoughts on “Marilyn’s New Faces by Louis Christopher | The Block Spring 2010”

  1. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  2. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  3. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply
  4. I'd have to agree on not being able to see their faces…kinda weird, was that purposeful? That the beautiful ones are invisible, so stellar you can't even see what they look like? Seems an unusual approach to making them household names, which I think would be the purpose of focusing on "new faces"…Photography is gorgeous, just think maybe this wasn't the right approach to showcase this talent…

    Reply

Leave a Comment