I agree with everyone else–the light, the colors, the dreamy look–never has the act of a girl going off to a field to diddle herself been portrayed so beautifully and artfully. I used to think I was just a pervert for dreaming of this kind of thing, but now I see that anything can pass muster in the name of high-fashion and high-art. Think your ideas might be mistaken as borderline, or even outright, wank material? Just put some artful sparkle dust on it and voila, you're a brilliant artist. Pedotastic!
3:33 am
Haha, very well put.
3:33 am
Haha, very well put.
3:33 am
Haha, very well put.
3:33 am
Haha, very well put.
http://www.girlmeetsnippon.wordpress.com Claire
It's funny how often this sentiment applies to "fashion" photoshoots. Funny or slightly depressing, some might say.
http://www.girlmeetsnippon.wordpress.com Claire
It's funny how often this sentiment applies to "fashion" photoshoots. Funny or slightly depressing, some might say.
http://www.girlmeetsnippon.wordpress.com Claire
It's funny how often this sentiment applies to "fashion" photoshoots. Funny or slightly depressing, some might say.
http://www.girlmeetsnippon.wordpress.com Claire
It's funny how often this sentiment applies to "fashion" photoshoots. Funny or slightly depressing, some might say.
Sean
I agree with everyone else–the light, the colors, the dreamy look–never has the act of a girl going off to a field to diddle herself been portrayed so beautifully and artfully. I used to think I was just a pervert for dreaming of this kind of thing, but now I see that anything can pass muster in the name of high-fashion and high-art. Think your ideas might be mistaken as borderline, or even outright, wank material? Just put some artful sparkle dust on it and voila, you're a brilliant artist. Pedotastic!
Sean
I agree with everyone else–the light, the colors, the dreamy look–never has the act of a girl going off to a field to diddle herself been portrayed so beautifully and artfully. I used to think I was just a pervert for dreaming of this kind of thing, but now I see that anything can pass muster in the name of high-fashion and high-art. Think your ideas might be mistaken as borderline, or even outright, wank material? Just put some artful sparkle dust on it and voila, you're a brilliant artist. Pedotastic!
Sean
I agree with everyone else–the light, the colors, the dreamy look–never has the act of a girl going off to a field to diddle herself been portrayed so beautifully and artfully. I used to think I was just a pervert for dreaming of this kind of thing, but now I see that anything can pass muster in the name of high-fashion and high-art. Think your ideas might be mistaken as borderline, or even outright, wank material? Just put some artful sparkle dust on it and voila, you're a brilliant artist. Pedotastic!
Sean
I agree with everyone else–the light, the colors, the dreamy look–never has the act of a girl going off to a field to diddle herself been portrayed so beautifully and artfully. I used to think I was just a pervert for dreaming of this kind of thing, but now I see that anything can pass muster in the name of high-fashion and high-art. Think your ideas might be mistaken as borderline, or even outright, wank material? Just put some artful sparkle dust on it and voila, you're a brilliant artist. Pedotastic!
3:33 am
Haha, very well put.
http://www.girlmeetsnippon.wordpress.com Claire
It's funny how often this sentiment applies to "fashion" photoshoots. Funny or slightly depressing, some might say.
Sean
I might add, despite the sarcasm of my initial reaction, I do actually like Sylvie Malfray's quality of work here. The few slightly pruriently posed photos ruined it for me, though. Don't know why she felt she had to go that way, the photos were just fine without having to resort to something resembling exploitation of a minor. I guess my comment was meant as more of a blanket observation of when smut tries to pose as art. Put another way, and at the risk of sounding (god forbid) prudish, the girl is much more attractive without her hand on her crotch.
Sean
I might add, despite the sarcasm of my initial reaction, I do actually like Sylvie Malfray's quality of work here. The few slightly pruriently posed photos ruined it for me, though. Don't know why she felt she had to go that way, the photos were just fine without having to resort to something resembling exploitation of a minor. I guess my comment was meant as more of a blanket observation of when smut tries to pose as art. Put another way, and at the risk of sounding (god forbid) prudish, the girl is much more attractive without her hand on her crotch.
Sean
I might add, despite the sarcasm of my initial reaction, I do actually like Sylvie Malfray's quality of work here. The few slightly pruriently posed photos ruined it for me, though. Don't know why she felt she had to go that way, the photos were just fine without having to resort to something resembling exploitation of a minor. I guess my comment was meant as more of a blanket observation of when smut tries to pose as art. Put another way, and at the risk of sounding (god forbid) prudish, the girl is much more attractive without her hand on her crotch.
Sean
I might add, despite the sarcasm of my initial reaction, I do actually like Sylvie Malfray's quality of work here. The few slightly pruriently posed photos ruined it for me, though. Don't know why she felt she had to go that way, the photos were just fine without having to resort to something resembling exploitation of a minor. I guess my comment was meant as more of a blanket observation of when smut tries to pose as art. Put another way, and at the risk of sounding (god forbid) prudish, the girl is much more attractive without her hand on her crotch.
Sean
I might add, despite the sarcasm of my initial reaction, I do actually like Sylvie Malfray's quality of work here. The few slightly pruriently posed photos ruined it for me, though. Don't know why she felt she had to go that way, the photos were just fine without having to resort to something resembling exploitation of a minor. I guess my comment was meant as more of a blanket observation of when smut tries to pose as art. Put another way, and at the risk of sounding (god forbid) prudish, the girl is much more attractive without her hand on her crotch.