Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115

By Joanna on 28 July 2010 in 2010, Editorial, Nudity, Numéro, Samantha Gradoville, Viviane Sassen

samantha gradoville Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115

Model Samantha Gradoville strips down to some of the season’s best outerwear for her debut appearance in August’s Numéro. Photographed by Viviane Sassen with styling by Belén Casadevall, Samantha sports an array of bright garments from the likes of Missoni, Ralph Lauren and Alberta Ferretti in the outdoor spread.

Note – nudity

samantha gradoville1 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville2 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville3 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville4 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville5 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville6 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville7 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville8 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville9 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville10 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville11 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville12 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
samantha gradoville13 Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115
source | MyFDB

http://fashionography.wordpress.com FASHIONOGRAPHY

So organic and inspiring.
http://fashionography.wordpress.com FASHIONOGRAPHY

So organic and inspiring.
joelle

maybe cedric buchet should have lensed this one
joelle

maybe cedric buchet should have lensed this one
kate

i can't really see the clothes, or the girl.
kate

i can't really see the clothes, or the girl.
http://intensedebate.com/people/mike3noel mike3noel

I would have loved to see more of Samantha's face but I do love this.

james

its not a test shoot so why do you need to see her face?

bbb

Bad exposures , lighting & composition all in one

Kim

I couldn't agree more. It's not even close to the high standard I would normally expect from a Numéro editorial.

james

bbb
whats wrong with the exposures?
Alex

The exposures are wrong yes, but the shadows and underexposure is intentional.

Moses McGumbi

I think it's wonderful all-round.

http://intensedebate.com/people/mike3noel mike3noel

I would have loved to see more of Samantha's face but I do love this.

james

its not a test shoot so why do you need to see her face?

bbb

Bad exposures , lighting & composition all in one

Kim

I couldn't agree more. It's not even close to the high standard I would normally expect from a Numéro editorial.

james

bbb
whats wrong with the exposures?
Alex

The exposures are wrong yes, but the shadows and underexposure is intentional.

Moses McGumbi

I think it's wonderful all-round.

BYRON MONTE

hahahaha! peeps on here are totally not getting interesting photography..if it's not karlie kloss jumping in a david sims' studio shoot decked out in camel with her hair in a high pony-tail you guys are baffled and left cluelless….read a book, watch a movie (no, not lagerfeld confidential or devil wears prada) maybe then you'll be able to appreciate different angles and views in photography…i doubt it though :-/

anonymous

a lot of people who frequent fashiongonerogue are sick of models jumping in front of the camera, I've seen countless comments stating that, so don't try to act so high and mighty when you sound quite ignorant yourself
Magnus

You're not getting it, Byron. This story should've been shot with on-camera flash (a la Terry Richardson), with emo models making faces and holding cucumbers in their hands. To further enhance it, they should have over-Photoshopped the faces to make the models look more like mannequins. These people look like actual human beings, which is disturbing since fashion has gone away from that trend. I have issues with that. And since my opinion is important (I'm a fashion editor; I have a fashion blog on-line that is visited 50 times a year!!!), I KNOW fashion. I even have a "fashion is…" line or two.

BYRON MONTE

Magnus! Damn, you can always trust the Swede's to come up with some truly wacky ideas…love it! You're my man Magnus!

BYRON MONTE

hahahaha! peeps on here are totally not getting interesting photography..if it's not karlie kloss jumping in a david sims' studio shoot decked out in camel with her hair in a high pony-tail you guys are baffled and left cluelless….read a book, watch a movie (no, not lagerfeld confidential or devil wears prada) maybe then you'll be able to appreciate different angles and views in photography…i doubt it though :-/

anonymous

a lot of people who frequent fashiongonerogue are sick of models jumping in front of the camera, I've seen countless comments stating that, so don't try to act so high and mighty when you sound quite ignorant yourself
Magnus

You're not getting it, Byron. This story should've been shot with on-camera flash (a la Terry Richardson), with emo models making faces and holding cucumbers in their hands. To further enhance it, they should have over-Photoshopped the faces to make the models look more like mannequins. These people look like actual human beings, which is disturbing since fashion has gone away from that trend. I have issues with that. And since my opinion is important (I'm a fashion editor; I have a fashion blog on-line that is visited 50 times a year!!!), I KNOW fashion. I even have a "fashion is…" line or two.

BYRON MONTE

Magnus! Damn, you can always trust the Swede's to come up with some truly wacky ideas…love it! You're my man Magnus!

Moses McGumbi

This is AMAZING.
Moses McGumbi

This is AMAZING.
Merel

She is so gorgeous. This whole shoot is great.
Merel

She is so gorgeous. This whole shoot is great.
maurice scherer

sloppy. why bother using a beautiful girl like Samantha if you're going to make her look ugly?
There are plenty of catalogue models who could have done this shoot.

bisr

What a stupid thing to say… You are missing the point… you are looking at the photo itself in Numero if in no other fashion magazine, not just following you favourite model or looking for the next fashions, you should be seeing an image. The image is what you should regard, it’s feel, how it lures you in or repels you etc etc. I say good show with the shadows. Also guys this is a scan no way of knowing if it is exposed wrongly, and anyway is there a hard and fast rule for ‘wrong exposure’, does it all have to look the same?

maurice scherer

sloppy. why bother using a beautiful girl like Samantha if you're going to make her look ugly?
There are plenty of catalogue models who could have done this shoot.

http://fashiongonerogue.com/wp-content/themes/knead

Samantha Gradoville by Viviane Sassen for Numéro #115

Back to Top

Photographers

Fashion Editors

Models

Labels