Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published July 6, 2011

/

Updated March 8, 2017

Dangerous LuxuryRaquel Zimmermann takes part in a hotel affair with Ben Hill for the fall 2011 campaign from Jimmy Choo. Lensed by Steven Meisel, Raquel is sexy yet sophisticated in the shoe wear advertisements. (Vogue Italia)



Recent Updates

Dior-Lip-Addict-Glow-2025-Ad

Jisoo, Anya Taylor-Joy & Willow Shine in New Dior Addict Ad

Dior is shining bright with its latest Dior Addict Lip Glow campaign. It stars three global icons: K-pop sensation Jisoo, ...
Perfect-Moment-Winter-2024

Perfect Moment Winter 2024: The Skiwear of Your Dreams

Perfect Moment’s winter 2024 collection spotlights high-performance skiwear and fashion-forward style. The campaign’s snow-drenched imagery highlights dynamic poses, showcasing the ...
Gwyneth-Paltrow-Saint-Laurent-Spring-2025

Gwyneth Paltrow Headlines Saint Laurent Spring 2025 Ad

Gwyneth Paltrow brings understated elegance as the new face of Saint Laurent's spring 2025 campaign. Shot by renowned photographer David ...
Balmain-Hair-1974-Campaign2

Balmain Hair Brings Back Vintage Glam Styles

Balmain Hair's new campaign is a striking homage to the brand’s 50-year legacy. Called 1974, the images star Eniko Mihalik ...
Carolina-Herrera-Good-Girl-Blush-Elixir

Karlie Kloss Stuns in Carolina Herrera’s Blush Elixir Ad

Carolina Herrera has introduced Good Girl Blush Elixir, a new eau de parfum. Supermodel Karlie Kloss, the original face of ...
PUMA-Juun-J-Speedcat

PUMA x Juun.J: The Speedcat Gets a Futuristic Makeover

PUMA and South Korean designer Juun.J are back with their second collaboration. And this one is turning heads. The duo ...

10 thoughts on “Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel”

    • Normally I don’t cry sexism, but I agree… That first shot before the cut really rubs me the wrong way, sadly.

      • Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.

        Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.

      • Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.

        Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.

Comments are closed.