Dolce & Gabbana Fall 2010 | Vlada Roslyakova, Olga Sherer & Zuzana Gregorova

36 thoughts on “Dolce & Gabbana Fall 2010 | Vlada Roslyakova, Olga Sherer & Zuzana Gregorova”

1. I don't like this. It looks very tacky and amateurish…both photography and modeling.

   • I completely agree, the casting is good but it just isn't great at all.

   • I completely agree, the casting is good but it just isn't great at all.

2. I don't like this. It looks very tacky and amateurish…both photography and modeling.

3. I don't like this. It looks very tacky and amateurish…both photography and modeling.

   • I completely agree, the casting is good but it just isn't great at all.

4. horrible

5. horrible

6. horrible

7. this brings me to soviet union

8. this brings me to soviet union

9. this brings me to soviet union

10. The flowers look more like Summer then Fall????

11. The flowers look more like Summer then Fall????

12. The flowers look more like Summer then Fall????

13. The first page was nice, the other 2 were just ok.

14. The first page was nice, the other 2 were just ok.

15. I love the close-up shots, especially of lovely Vlada. Aside from that, I think the appalling clothes are to blame for the amateur appearance of the ad. The "posed" concept with bold colours might have worked more classic clothes.

16. I love the close-up shots, especially of lovely Vlada. Aside from that, I think the appalling clothes are to blame for the amateur appearance of the ad. The "posed" concept with bold colours might have worked more classic clothes.

17. I love the close-up shots, especially of lovely Vlada. Aside from that, I think the appalling clothes are to blame for the amateur appearance of the ad. The "posed" concept with bold colours might have worked more classic clothes.

18. Why does it look so cheap?

19. Why does it look so cheap?

20. Why does it look so cheap?

21. loving the hell out of this…

    • Why??? It's drab, the only point of interest is in the retouching, and all the clothes look straight out of the show "Jersey Shore."

      Ugghh-ly.

    • Why??? It's drab, the only point of interest is in the retouching, and all the clothes look straight out of the show "Jersey Shore."

      Ugghh-ly.

22. loving the hell out of this…

    • Why??? It's drab, the only point of interest is in the retouching, and all the clothes look straight out of the show "Jersey Shore."

      Ugghh-ly.

23. great selection of models but everything else is so disappointing. looks so cheap and tacky. not high end at all

24. great selection of models but everything else is so disappointing. looks so cheap and tacky. not high end at all

25. Perhaps it's not really supposed to look high end. I think that D&G have done other things that could be construed at "tacky" — I chalk it up to their being Italian. In a lot of ways, D&G is like the expensive big sister of GUESS, another Italian brand that straddles the line between lux and tacky — just at a different price point.

    I do think the styling of the shoot is a bit stilted — but on the other hand it definitely keeps the clothes as the focus…which is kinda the point.

26. Perhaps it's not really supposed to look high end. I think that D&G have done other things that could be construed at "tacky" — I chalk it up to their being Italian. In a lot of ways, D&G is like the expensive big sister of GUESS, another Italian brand that straddles the line between lux and tacky — just at a different price point.

    I do think the styling of the shoot is a bit stilted — but on the other hand it definitely keeps the clothes as the focus…which is kinda the point.

27. ugh! really tacky!
    I can get way better clothes from zara!

28. ugh! really tacky!
    I can get way better clothes from zara!

29. The close-ups are stunning, all the rest is complete crap.

30. The close-ups are stunning, all the rest is complete crap.

Comments are closed.