Photographed by Henrik Adamsen, model newcomer Sophie Edenhoeg gets romantic for one of her first editorial works. With the aide of stylist Sarah Paaschburg, Adamsen captures as Sophie spends a day of relaxation and cozying up to that special boy in her life played by fellow 2pm model Christopher Sylvest.
She's so unbelievably beautiful.
She's so unbelievably beautiful.
she is but this is a terrible editorial
she is but this is a terrible editorial
I looove the shoes in the photo where she is laying on the couch.. Anyone who knows who made them?
I looove the shoes in the photo where she is laying on the couch.. Anyone who knows who made them?
She's very beautiful, yes. But it's sad she looks so angry in every picture.
She's very beautiful, yes. But it's sad she looks so angry in every picture.
Beautiful story
Beautiful story
she's really beautiful, but she had the same expression in every picture.
she's really beautiful, but she had the same expression in every picture.
amazing
amazing
Pretty good for one of her first editorials. People can be so critical.
My thought exactly. Besides – lots of models get by on pretty much one look. Freja Beha for example
I disagree with that comment about Freja Beha. Her recent editorial work ('In Grande Stile' with Meisel, the close-up shots with Emma Summerton, 'NY, NY 10021' with Inez and Vinoodh, 'Tango' by Karl Lagerfeld) and runway performance (opening and closing Oscar de la Renta!) shows that she can easily model outside of 'one look'.
But I do agree that there are some models who basically recycle one look over and over again. It's just a matter of how appealing it is in the long run. Although newcomer Sophie is pretty, her irritated expression isn't.
It's a good first try nevertheless. Wishing her all the best!
Pretty good for one of her first editorials. People can be so critical.
My thought exactly. Besides – lots of models get by on pretty much one look. Freja Beha for example
I disagree with that comment about Freja Beha. Her recent editorial work ('In Grande Stile' with Meisel, the close-up shots with Emma Summerton, 'NY, NY 10021' with Inez and Vinoodh, 'Tango' by Karl Lagerfeld) and runway performance (opening and closing Oscar de la Renta!) shows that she can easily model outside of 'one look'.
But I do agree that there are some models who basically recycle one look over and over again. It's just a matter of how appealing it is in the long run. Although newcomer Sophie is pretty, her irritated expression isn't.
It's a good first try nevertheless. Wishing her all the best!
This is out of order. Regardless of how beautiful she comes across, she is a child. The theme of this shoot is strongly suggesting under-age sex and is only going to fuel the already "Sky-high" single mum population. Aren't there enough models to do this job? Henrik Adamsen is obiously into something that isn't good for anyone. Those who dissagree should also take stock.
Are you serious? They are just laying in bed together and the boy doesn't look that much older himself. I could see if she was naked or wearing lingerie, but come on.
First and fourth pictures that include the male model are suggestive of a mature relationship. Which when coupled with images of them on the bed assumes a sexual relationship. Sorry but the coding is right. These pictures contain subtle sexual messages, regardless of how young or innocent they look.
"These pictures contain subtle sexual messages" <—-you are a bit of a jack-ass. It is fashion not a lesson on ethics or morality for fuck-sake.
I never made any comments on ethics or morality. Personally I find her beautiful and the editorial is okay.. I've seen better. But the pictures do contain sexual messages, denying it won't make it go away, neither will calling anyone a jack-ass change anything. Be polite.
You're really naive and brainwashed.
Let's dismantle this a bit, shall we? What is a model's job? Beyond selling clothes and products, one job of a model is to act. She is 14 and she is obviously role-playing the part of what is maybe an older teenage girl. Thus the theme of this shoot is suitable. The only thing that her age prevents her from doing is something that she is not doing anyway – posing nude. I agree with 'Big.' This is fashion, not a lesson in ethics or morality. Get the fuck over it.
🙂
yes let us posit that she is merely a model and not a real person who is being told to act outside (hopefully) her experience and age range. No need to go dropping the f bomb, we can all politely agree that some of us have higher standards for the industry than others.
This is out of order. Regardless of how beautiful she comes across, she is a child. The theme of this shoot is strongly suggesting under-age sex and is only going to fuel the already "Sky-high" single mum population. Aren't there enough models to do this job? Henrik Adamsen is obiously into something that isn't good for anyone. Those who dissagree should also take stock.
Are you serious? They are just laying in bed together and the boy doesn't look that much older himself. I could see if she was naked or wearing lingerie, but come on.
First and fourth pictures that include the male model are suggestive of a mature relationship. Which when coupled with images of them on the bed assumes a sexual relationship. Sorry but the coding is right. These pictures contain subtle sexual messages, regardless of how young or innocent they look.
"These pictures contain subtle sexual messages" <—-you are a bit of a jack-ass. It is fashion not a lesson on ethics or morality for fuck-sake.
I never made any comments on ethics or morality. Personally I find her beautiful and the editorial is okay.. I've seen better. But the pictures do contain sexual messages, denying it won't make it go away, neither will calling anyone a jack-ass change anything. Be polite.
You're really naive and brainwashed.
Let's dismantle this a bit, shall we? What is a model's job? Beyond selling clothes and products, one job of a model is to act. She is 14 and she is obviously role-playing the part of what is maybe an older teenage girl. Thus the theme of this shoot is suitable. The only thing that her age prevents her from doing is something that she is not doing anyway – posing nude. I agree with 'Big.' This is fashion, not a lesson in ethics or morality. Get the fuck over it.
🙂
yes let us posit that she is merely a model and not a real person who is being told to act outside (hopefully) her experience and age range. No need to go dropping the f bomb, we can all politely agree that some of us have higher standards for the industry than others.
beautiful yet bad posing… Here head looks like it might pop off!
beautiful yet bad posing… Here head looks like it might pop off!
crazy beautiful
hard to believe shes only 14
She's 14?!…
crazy beautiful
hard to believe shes only 14
She's 14?!…
I simply look at these images and find them beautiful. Period. Gorgous girl no matter how old she is, and I think on the topic of if this is sexual or not – the eye sees what the eye wants to see. I don't see anything sexual here. I'm in love with this editorial!
I simply look at these images and find them beautiful. Period. Gorgous girl no matter how old she is, and I think on the topic of if this is sexual or not – the eye sees what the eye wants to see. I don't see anything sexual here. I'm in love with this editorial!