17 thoughts on “Harper’s Bazaar US September 2009 – Leighton Meester by Terry Richardson”
gah I hope subscribers are getting a different cover, as we often do. the text is so distracting.
gah I hope subscribers are getting a different cover, as we often do. the text is so distracting.
gah I hope subscribers are getting a different cover, as we often do. the text is so distracting.
gah I hope subscribers are getting a different cover, as we often do. the text is so distracting.
F___ing LOVE Leighton!
F___ing LOVE Leighton!
That cover looks fake- it’s so awful.
That cover looks fake- it’s so awful.
That cover looks fake- it’s so awful.
That cover looks fake- it’s so awful.
I don’t understand why there needs to be so much text on the cover. If the picture was halfway interesting, I would just pick up the magazine and flip through it. I don’t need the table of contents covering Leighton’s body.
I don’t understand why there needs to be so much text on the cover. If the picture was halfway interesting, I would just pick up the magazine and flip through it. I don’t need the table of contents covering Leighton’s body.
I don’t understand why there needs to be so much text on the cover. If the picture was halfway interesting, I would just pick up the magazine and flip through it. I don’t need the table of contents covering Leighton’s body.
I don’t understand why there needs to be so much text on the cover. If the picture was halfway interesting, I would just pick up the magazine and flip through it. I don’t need the table of contents covering Leighton’s body.
I thought only Lindbergh or Alexi Lubomirski are contracted to do covers – does this mean someone is out and Terry is in?!
I thought only Lindbergh or Alexi Lubomirski are contracted to do covers – does this mean someone is out and Terry is in?!
I thought only Lindbergh or Alexi Lubomirski are contracted to do covers – does this mean someone is out and Terry is in?!
Comments are closed.
To best optimize our website for visitors, we use cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to the use of cookies.OkRead more
gah I hope subscribers are getting a different cover, as we often do. the text is so distracting.
gah I hope subscribers are getting a different cover, as we often do. the text is so distracting.
gah I hope subscribers are getting a different cover, as we often do. the text is so distracting.
gah I hope subscribers are getting a different cover, as we often do. the text is so distracting.
F___ing LOVE Leighton!
F___ing LOVE Leighton!
That cover looks fake- it’s so awful.
That cover looks fake- it’s so awful.
That cover looks fake- it’s so awful.
That cover looks fake- it’s so awful.
I don’t understand why there needs to be so much text on the cover. If the picture was halfway interesting, I would just pick up the magazine and flip through it. I don’t need the table of contents covering Leighton’s body.
I don’t understand why there needs to be so much text on the cover. If the picture was halfway interesting, I would just pick up the magazine and flip through it. I don’t need the table of contents covering Leighton’s body.
I don’t understand why there needs to be so much text on the cover. If the picture was halfway interesting, I would just pick up the magazine and flip through it. I don’t need the table of contents covering Leighton’s body.
I don’t understand why there needs to be so much text on the cover. If the picture was halfway interesting, I would just pick up the magazine and flip through it. I don’t need the table of contents covering Leighton’s body.
I thought only Lindbergh or Alexi Lubomirski are contracted to do covers – does this mean someone is out and Terry is in?!
I thought only Lindbergh or Alexi Lubomirski are contracted to do covers – does this mean someone is out and Terry is in?!
I thought only Lindbergh or Alexi Lubomirski are contracted to do covers – does this mean someone is out and Terry is in?!