Dangerous Luxury – Raquel Zimmermann takes part in a hotel affair with Ben Hill for the fall 2011 campaign from Jimmy Choo. Lensed by Steven Meisel, Raquel is sexy yet sophisticated in the shoe wear advertisements. (Vogue Italia)
Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel
Recent Updates
Charli XCX Strips Down for Acne Studios Spring 2025 Ad
Charli XCX is taking the fashion world by storm, and she has recently been announced as the face of Acne ...
Chanel’s Cruise 2025 Campaign Escapes to the Sea
Sun-drenched style takes center stage in Chanel’s cruise 2025 campaign, shot on location in the breathtaking South of France. Behind ...
Kim Kardashian’s SKIMS & Dolce & Gabbana Exude Italian Chic
Dolce & Gabbana and Skims are teaming up for an unforgettable collaboration. This limited-edition line is deeply rooted in the ...
Giorgio Armani Neve Brings Chilly Style to the Winter Season
Giorgio Armani Neve’s fall-winter 2024-2025 collection is a stylish storm that’s about to hit the slopes. The collection features women’s ...
Emily Ratajkowski is Intimissimi’s New Ambassador (Photos)
Emily Ratajkowski is joining forces with Intimissimi, the Italian lingerie powerhouse, as the brand’s new ambassador. This exciting partnership marks ...
Valentino Holiday 2024 Campaign: An Ode to Extravagance
Valentino is raising the bar with a Holiday 2024 campaign that dazzles. Part of the Avant Les Débuts series, the ...
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Agreed. The preview image does not sit well with me.
Normally I don’t cry sexism, but I agree… That first shot before the cut really rubs me the wrong way, sadly.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
it looks vell nice and we all like it Ralph Lauren
Polos Short Sleeve Men’s dress shirts are
accessible Shop Cheap Jimmy Choo bags