Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published July 6, 2011

/

Updated March 8, 2017

Dangerous LuxuryRaquel Zimmermann takes part in a hotel affair with Ben Hill for the fall 2011 campaign from Jimmy Choo. Lensed by Steven Meisel, Raquel is sexy yet sophisticated in the shoe wear advertisements. (Vogue Italia)



Recent Updates

Victorias-Secret-Valentines-Day-2025-4

Victoria’s Secret’s 2025 Valentine’s Day Line is a Must-See

Victoria’s Secret sets the tone for a romantic Valentine’s Day 2025 with its dazzling new campaign. Models Taylor Hill, Devyn ...
Gracie-Abrams-Chanel-Spring-2025

Gracie Abrams is Now a Chanel Girl, See the Photos

Gracie Abrams steps into the spotlight as Chanel’s latest ambassador and the face of its spring-summer 2025 pre-collection. Known for ...
Loro-Piana-Spring-Summer-2025

Loro Piana Has a Rio Vibe for Spring 2025 Campaign

Loro Piana transports us to the heart of Rio de Janeiro for its spring-summer 2025 campaign, captured by the renowned ...
Issey-Miyake-Spring-2025

Issey Miyake Spring 2025: The Beauty of Paper

Issey Miyake’s spring-summer 2025 campaign spotlights “The Beauty of Paper” collection. Handmade paper inspired the designs. Photographer Jamie Hawkesworth captures ...
Dua-Lipa-YSL-Beauty-Make-Me-Blush

Dua Lipa Wows in YSL Beauty Make Me Blush Ad

Dua Lipa takes center stage in YSL Beauty’s latest Make Me Blush Bold Blurring Blush campaign. She captivates with her ...
Louis-Vuitton-Spring-2025-Lisa

Lisa & Saoirse Ronan Front Dreamy Louis Vuitton Spring 2025 Ad

Louis Vuitton’s spring 2025 campaign blurs the line between fashion and art, starring global icons Lisa of Blackpink and actress ...

10 thoughts on “Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel”

    • Normally I don’t cry sexism, but I agree… That first shot before the cut really rubs me the wrong way, sadly.

      • Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.

        Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.

      • Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.

        Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.

Comments are closed.