Dangerous Luxury – Raquel Zimmermann takes part in a hotel affair with Ben Hill for the fall 2011 campaign from Jimmy Choo. Lensed by Steven Meisel, Raquel is sexy yet sophisticated in the shoe wear advertisements. (Vogue Italia)
Raquel Zimmermann for Jimmy Choo Fall 2011 Campaign by Steven Meisel
Recent Updates
Laetitia Casta Leads Balmain’s Spring 2025 Ad
Balmain enlists French icon Laetitia Casta as the face of its spring-summer 2025 campaign. Captured by Juergen Teller under the ...
Hermès Spring 2025 Campaign is Walking On a Dream
Hermès unveils its spring-summer 2025 campaign with striking visuals that merge fashion with surreal artistry. Titled “The Endless Line,” the ...
Victoria’s Secret Swim Dives Into Its Archives
Victoria’s Secret is heating things up with its latest limited-edition capsule, VS Archives Swim. The collection, featuring sleek swimwear, is ...
Eva Mendes, Raye Return for Stella McCartney Summer 2025
Stella McCartney’s summer 2025 campaign takes flight with a cast of powerful voices including Eva Mendes, Alex Consani, Myha’la, and ...
Valentino’s Spring 2025 Campaign is A Luxe Dream
Valentino unveils its spring-summer 2025 campaign, Pavillon des Folies, a theatrical mixture of nostalgia and modernity. Under the creative direction ...
Irina Shayk Headlines Tory Burch’s Spring 2025 Ad
Tory Burch takes inspiration from athletic aesthetics for its spring 2025 campaign. The images feature models Irina Shayk, Mona Tougaard, ...
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Agreed. The preview image does not sit well with me.
Normally I don’t cry sexism, but I agree… That first shot before the cut really rubs me the wrong way, sadly.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
Sexism because she’s on her knees in front of a man? But wouldn’t it only be sexist if you think that RZ’s character is not in a submissive position out of her own free will? Maybe she’s begging him to leave his wife or maybe she just likes being in this position because submitting to someone can be very pleasing. I don’t find either of those options sexist and they are the first situations that I think of when I try to over analyze this campaign.
Dunno, maybe you see something else I just think the new puritanism has the reverse effect of ’empowering women’.
dont like it
i find it kind of sexist
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
Raquel always delivers something special, I think this is what modelling is
it looks vell nice and we all like it Ralph Lauren
Polos Short Sleeve Men’s dress shirts are
accessible Shop Cheap Jimmy Choo bags