Vogue US January 2011 Cover | Natalie Portman by Peter Lindbergh

13 thoughts on “Vogue US January 2011 Cover | Natalie Portman by Peter Lindbergh”

1. BORING

   http://whycantmybestfriendbeme.blogspot.com/

2. It is boring but she is so talented I don’t even care. I just saw Black Swan…oh my god. She better win best actress at the Oscars.

   • that’s exactly what i thought. the cover might be boring, but who cares if it’s natalie )

   • Agreed 100%.

3. Can’t wait to see Black Swan.

   http://thechicaddict.blogspot.com

4. well, it certainly makes any Harper’s Bazaar (even if photographed by a creep) cover take the lead when you see what US Vogue comes up with nearly every month.

5. is not boring, is perfection

6. She’s so stunning but this cover is just dreadful, no?

7. her hand is so awkward.

8. The dress is really cute, ut her face and the pose is akward!

9. She looks BORED of out her mind. And so am I. Yet another FAILED cover for US Vogue. New Year didnt teach them anything.

10. Natalie is gorgeous and the film is a psychological thriller, why make her look so placid and BORED, they could have put more depth/charactor into the photo. Why does Vogue US get such accolades and wows when it is stale and sooooo old fashioned. And not in the Mad Men way.

11. The otherwise pointless elevation of Natalie Portman has coincided with, and will probably be remembered in association with, what is hopefully the nadir of Jewish American culture (the bloom of Jewish imperialism, the stench of the association with Dershowitz, etc).

Comments are closed.