Megan Fox, really?

who?

yeah, i agree the shots are too inconsistent, i do like the way she looks in the first and second shots, for the rest nothing special. should have captured her natural beauty instead of making her look too artificial

http://elenavasilieva.blogspot.com/
x

I think they could have done a lot more with this shoot. They didn’t do anything more with her than any other beauty model. Which is a shame. And the retouching is really inconsistent, as others have pointed out.

Yeah, photoshop overkill. I suppose there was no other way. Between Fox’s tattoos and lack of talent as an actress much less a model there wasn’t much else the editors to work with. Poor choice, Armani. Poor choice.

Yeah, photoshop overkill. I suppose there was no other way. Between Fox’s tattoos and lack of talent as an actress much less a model there wasn’t much else the editors to work with. Poor choice, Armani. Poor choice.

poor girl, she looks like mannequin :/ it’s photoshop artwork, not photography any more.

I agree this was a poor choice, Armani. Next time use a professional model. 

http://awmagazine13-53.blogspot.com/

I agree this was a poor choice, Armani. Next time use a professional model. 

http://awmagazine13-53.blogspot.com/

GO MEGAN!!!!

haha looks like a painting in some parts ^^ one can use photoshop in a much better way!!!!

haha looks like a painting in some parts ^^ one can use photoshop in a much better way!!!!