Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published May 8, 2011

/

Updated September 3, 2019

Cotton Candy Girls – Photographer Lara Jade takes to the open fields and blue skies for the latest issue of Material Girl. Working with stylist Lauren Armes, Jade captures Gigi and Irena in airy ethereal looks with pink bobs courtesy of hair stylist Damian Monzillo. / Makeup by Damian Monzillo, Retouching by Lara Jade







Recent Updates

Ireen-Tabolova-Editorial

Ireen Tabolova Brings Bold Glamour to Vogue Greece

For the November 2024 issue of Vogue Greece, Ireen Tabolova stuns in an editorial captured by photographer Thanassis Krikis (10 ...
Lily Drinkwater Brings Refined Style to Harper's Bazaar Greece

Lily Drinkwater Brings Refined Style to Harper’s Bazaar Greece

Photographed by George Katsanakis (10 AM), model Lily Drinkwater shines in the December 2024 issue of Harper’s Bazaar Greece. The ...
Maike-Inga

Maike Inge Rocks Leather at the Office in Vogue Greece

Photographer Panos Davios (10 AM) captures Maike Inga in a stunning transformation of office wear for Vogue Greece’s October 2024 ...
Exclusive: Tracy Joseph by Aubrey Chandler in 'Sparkling Canvas'

Exclusive: Tracy Joseph by Aubrey Chandler in ‘Sparkling Canvas’

Photographer Aubrey Chandler turns up the shine factor in FGR’s most recent exclusive. Haitian model Tracy Joseph dazzles in glitter ...
Athina-Koini-Editorial

Athina Koini Gets Luxe in Harper’s Bazaar Germany

Lensed by Haris Farsarakis (10 AM), model Athina Koini commands attention in a fashion editorial for Harper’s Bazaar Germany’s September ...
Jessica-Stam-Harpers-Bazaar-Turkey

Jessica Stam Wows in Gucci for Harper’s Bazaar Turkey

Photographer Daniella Midenge captures top model Jessica Stam for the December 2024 cover of Harper’s Bazaar Turkey. Jessica looks stunning ...

56 thoughts on “Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl”

  1. ohmygod…i looove the pastel colors!!!

    but the photography technique is very usual

    devi-kusumawardani.blogspot.com

  2. totally in love with the colors/ styling and photography!

    btw do drop by my site as i have EXTENDED THE BRASHY x MONSTRE XI GIVEAWAY by a week. No harm trying your luck for a cool tshirt (:

    x leonie

  3. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    • The person above you isn’t “hating,” they gave their opinion in a very polite and intelligent way. If they don’t like the photography, then they don’t like it, everyone feels differently about things as subjective as this editorial.

      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

  4. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  5. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  6. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  7. It means well…but there is no attention to detail…like the fact that it is a brown, dry, dirty looking setting, and the girls look cold, and those kind of cheap plastic wigs only look good when they have been trimmed..half-assed Tim Walker….not good

  8. no chemistry between the models. they just dont look like they are close. leaves me cold.

  9. no chemistry between the models. they just dont look like they are close. leaves me cold.

  10. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  11. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  12. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  13. It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

  14. It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

  15.      Well-known luxury brands (Louis Vuitton). Louis Vuitton was founded in 1854?authentic louis vuitton, now part of French post-production high luxury goods group Moet Hennessy LouisVuitton?louis vuitton black. Founder of the first post of Louis Vuitton LV jewelry industry for the elite aristocracy?louis vuitton outlet?when pack when traveling. He witnessed the invention of the steam train?louis vuitton wallet, also witnessed the development of steamshipcheap miu miu?transportation?cheap fendi, but also deeply appreciate the dome was closed stacked luggage difficulties?louis vuitton sofia coppola.  

Comments are closed.