Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl

Joanna Elizabeth

/

Published May 8, 2011

/

Updated September 3, 2019

Cotton Candy Girls – Photographer Lara Jade takes to the open fields and blue skies for the latest issue of Material Girl. Working with stylist Lauren Armes, Jade captures Gigi and Irena in airy ethereal looks with pink bobs courtesy of hair stylist Damian Monzillo. / Makeup by Damian Monzillo, Retouching by Lara Jade







Recent Updates

Josephine-Skriver-Vogue-Scandinavia

Josephine Skriver’s Stunning Return to Vogue Scandinavia

Josephine Skriver takes center stage as the November 2024 digital cover star of Vogue Scandinavia. In images by Danish photographer ...
Akolde Meen Layers Up in Outerwear for Mojeh Magazine

Akolde Meen Layers Up in Outerwear for Mojeh Magazine

In a recent issue of Mojeh Magazine, model Akolde Meen bundles up in voluminous outerwear for cold-weather chic. Photographer Andrew ...
Malaika Holmen Rocks the Fall Collections in Vogue Arabia

Malaika Holmen Rocks the Fall Collections in Vogue Arabia

In the September 2024 issue of Vogue Arabia, Malaika Holmén steps out in style in images captured by David Roemer ...
Naomi-Campbell-V-Magazine

Naomi Campbell Wows in Dolce & Gabbana for V Magazine

Naomi Campbell, the legendary face, graces not one but two covers of V Magazine’s Winter 2024 issue, V151. Shot by ...
Jana-Julius-Numero-Netherlands

Jana Julius Rocks Daring Beach Style in Numéro Netherlands

Photographer Stockton Johnson heads to the beach for the October 2024 issue of Numéro Netherlands. An editorial called Rebel Tide ...
Exclusive: Mathilda & Arifi by Jø Cheung in 'I Went Dancing with My Sister'

Exclusive: Mathilda & Arifi by Jø Cheung in ‘I Went Dancing with My Sister’

Photographer Jø Cheung explores familial connections for FGR's most recent exclusive. Models Mathilda Forssbeck and Arifi star as two siblings ...

56 thoughts on “Gigi & Irena by Lara Jade for Material Girl”

  1. ohmygod…i looove the pastel colors!!!

    but the photography technique is very usual

    devi-kusumawardani.blogspot.com

  2. totally in love with the colors/ styling and photography!

    btw do drop by my site as i have EXTENDED THE BRASHY x MONSTRE XI GIVEAWAY by a week. No harm trying your luck for a cool tshirt (:

    x leonie

  3. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

    • The person above you isn’t “hating,” they gave their opinion in a very polite and intelligent way. If they don’t like the photography, then they don’t like it, everyone feels differently about things as subjective as this editorial.

      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

      • I wasn’t speaking to MathildeJohnsen – hence why the comment wasn’t a reply, rather the next in a series of comments on the images. I completely agree with you on her response being polite and intelligent.

        However, “Stupid texture adding and weird poses. All the same, no difference.” How is that polite and intelligent???

  4. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  5. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  6. “blah blah blah I hate on shoots like this because I am no where near as talented, and have most likely failed at photography or some other creative outlet.”

    People like you make the internet suck. – Don’t like it? Offer some constructive critique, or post a link to your portfolio instead.

  7. It means well…but there is no attention to detail…like the fact that it is a brown, dry, dirty looking setting, and the girls look cold, and those kind of cheap plastic wigs only look good when they have been trimmed..half-assed Tim Walker….not good

  8. no chemistry between the models. they just dont look like they are close. leaves me cold.

  9. no chemistry between the models. they just dont look like they are close. leaves me cold.

  10. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  11. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  12. The retouching on these leaves a lot to be desired, especially on that third one — the close up image. I understand that it’s probably the light coming through the balloons, but the yellow cast to their skin and that strange purple hand is very unflattering. I also agree with the previous comment that the texture on the 4th left diptych especially seems rather tacky and unfitting for the editorial. And the fact that the first couple of images the girls are really underexposed is bothering me. Reflectors! Really, they help. I’m also not a big fan of the wigs. Actually, the pink one doesn’t look so bad, but the cut on the orange one makes it look cheap.

  13. It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

  14. It doesn’t matter with the process. the important is the result. And you’re works are amazing me! ganbatte! love lara

  15.      Well-known luxury brands (Louis Vuitton). Louis Vuitton was founded in 1854?authentic louis vuitton, now part of French post-production high luxury goods group Moet Hennessy LouisVuitton?louis vuitton black. Founder of the first post of Louis Vuitton LV jewelry industry for the elite aristocracy?louis vuitton outlet?when pack when traveling. He witnessed the invention of the steam train?louis vuitton wallet, also witnessed the development of steamshipcheap miu miu?transportation?cheap fendi, but also deeply appreciate the dome was closed stacked luggage difficulties?louis vuitton sofia coppola.  

Comments are closed.